Last updated:
The Plaato Airlock was one of the first digital fermentation monitors to gain traction in homebrewing, a WiFi-connected airlock that estimates fermentation activity from CO2 bubble counting rather than floating in the beer. I’ve used the Plaato alongside a traditional S-type airlock on split batches and the comparison clarifies exactly what digital airlock monitoring provides and where its fundamental limitations lie.
Plaato Airlock vs. traditional airlock: what’s actually different
Traditional airlocks (S-type and 3-piece): A water-filled or sanitizer-filled one-way valve that allows CO2 to escape while preventing outside air from entering the fermenter. The S-type (double-bubble) airlock is the most common, fill with StarSan to the fill line, insert into the bung, and observe bubbling as CO2 releases during active fermentation. The 3-piece airlock allows easier cleaning. Neither type provides any data beyond visual observation of bubble rate. Traditional airlocks cost $0.50–2.00 and require no power, batteries, or connectivity. They do their primary job (CO2 release, oxygen exclusion) indefinitely and reliably. Plaato Airlock: A WiFi-connected airlock replacement that counts CO2 bubbles using a capacitive sensor and transmits the data to the Plaato app over WiFi. The app displays a real-time bubble rate graph, estimates apparent attenuation (the percentage of fermentation complete based on cumulative CO2), and provides historical trend data across the fermentation. Charges via USB-C, WiFi-connected, cloud-logged. Price: approximately $60–80 USD. The Plaato Airlock does NOT directly measure gravity, it infers fermentation progress from CO2 production rate. The app’s “apparent attenuation” estimate is a calculation from cumulative bubble count, not a direct gravity measurement. Fundamental limitation of bubble counting: CO2 bubble rate is a proxy for fermentation activity, not a measurement of remaining sugar. During active primary fermentation (first 24–72 hours), bubble rate correlates well with fermentation rate. However: (1) CO2 also evolves from solution as temperature changes without active fermentation, a temperature drop degasses dissolved CO2 and produces bubbling that registers as fermentation activity. (2) Late fermentation produces very slow CO2 rates that may register as “fermentation complete” before gravity has actually stabilized. (3) The app’s attenuation estimate assumes linear sugar consumption per CO2 bubble, actual fermentation efficiency varies with yeast strain, temperature, and wort composition in ways the bubble counter cannot detect. (4) Pressure-fermented beers in sealed vessels produce no airlock bubbles at all.
Practical value: what Plaato is actually good for
Where Plaato provides real value: Remote fermentation monitoring, knowing whether a batch has started fermenting without physically checking. Tracking fermentation timeline across batches for process consistency comparison. Getting a notification when bubble rate drops significantly (fermentation winding down) as a prompt to check gravity with a hydrometer. The app’s historical data allows comparison of fermentation curves across different yeast strains, temperatures, and recipes. For brewers who travel or have fermenters in inconvenient locations (garage, basement, remote space), the remote monitoring capability has genuine utility. Where traditional airlock is sufficient: For brewers who check their fermenters daily anyway, the Plaato provides data that is observable with a glance at a bubbling airlock. The cost difference ($0.50 traditional versus $60–80 Plaato) is justified only if remote monitoring or data logging provides value beyond what physical observation offers. Comparison to floating hydrometers: Tilt and iSpindel provide actual gravity data from which real fermentation progress can be determined. Plaato provides CO2 bubble data from which fermentation progress is estimated with significant uncertainty. For fermentation monitoring with actionable data, a floating gravity monitor (Tilt or iSpindel) provides substantially more useful information than the Plaato’s bubble counting. If cost allows only one upgrade from a traditional airlock, a Tilt or iSpindel is more informative than a Plaato.
Common Questions
Is StarSan or water better in a traditional airlock?
StarSan solution is better than plain water in a traditional airlock for two reasons: contamination prevention and evaporation resistance. Plain water in an airlock is a potential contamination risk if the fermenter pressure drops below atmospheric pressure, this occurs during temperature drops after fermentation (as the fermenter cools, the headspace gas contracts, potentially drawing airlock liquid back into the fermenter). If the airlock contains plain water, this backflow introduces unsanitized water into the beer. StarSan solution in the airlock ensures any backflow is sanitized rather than potentially contaminating. The second benefit: StarSan’s slightly elevated surface tension from the surfactant component slows evaporation compared to plain water, reducing the frequency of topping off the airlock during extended conditioning periods. A few drops of StarSan in 20–30mL of water (the correct fill level for an S-type airlock) at the normal use dilution (1oz per 5 gallons, approximately 1.5mL per gallon) is the right fill. Some brewers use vodka or other neutral spirits in airlocks specifically for the evaporation resistance, spirits evaporate slower than water and provide sanitizing capability. Either StarSan solution or vodka is appropriate; plain tap water is technically acceptable but suboptimal for the contamination risk during temperature-driven pressure drops. Change the airlock liquid whenever it becomes visibly dirty or drops below the minimum fill line.
